Screener
EIPX vs MLPA
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- MLPA costs 0.18% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than EIPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EIPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EIPX | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.0% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.12% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EIPX and MLPA
Explore further