Screener
EMBD vs PFFV
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.14% less per year.
- EMBD covers emerging markets markets; PFFV covers north america.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; PFFV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $302M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and PFFV
Explore further