Screener
EMBX vs ANGL
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.51% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than EMBX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ANGL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBX | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $244M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.51% | 6.31% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.2% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.94% | 4.33% |
| Max drawdown | -37.55% | -29.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBX and ANGL
Explore further