Screener
EMBX vs EMBD
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.37% less per year.
- EMBX follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMBD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBX | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $244M | $256M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.51% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.2% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.94% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -37.55% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBX and EMBD
Explore further