Screener
EMC vs KRMA
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs Global X Conscious Companies ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.22% less per year.
- EMC covers emerging markets markets; KRMA covers north america.
- EMC follows a active selection strategy; KRMA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMC | KRMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $116M |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 2.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.3% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.8% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.53% | 12.33% |
| Max drawdown | -18.38% | -36.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMC and KRMA
Explore further