Screener
KRMA vs EMM
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- KRMA covers north america markets; EMM covers emerging markets.
- KRMA follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $58M |
| Since | 2016 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +60.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.33% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and EMM
Explore further