Screener
EMCB vs MANI
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
EMCB is a fixed income ETF, while MANI is an alternative ETF. EMCB charges 0.61% a year and MANI 0.01%.
- EMCB is a fixed income fund, while MANI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MANI costs 0.60% less per year.
- EMCB is much larger than MANI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCB | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $20M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.36% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.19% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.81% | -0.73% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.