Screener
EMCR vs AQWA
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- EMCR costs 0.35% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCR | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $26M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.7% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -34.28% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCR and AQWA
Explore further