Screener
EMCR vs USCA
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.08% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than EMCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCR covers emerging markets markets; USCA covers north america.
- EMCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCR | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.7% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.0% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 12.20% |
| Max drawdown | -34.28% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCR and USCA
Explore further