Screener
USCA vs EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.08% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than EMCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- USCA covers north america markets; EMCS covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| USCA | EMCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $912M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.20% | 21.77% |
| Max drawdown | -19.14% | -44.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to USCA and EMCS
Explore further