Screener
EMCS vs USCA
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.08% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than EMCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMCS covers emerging markets markets; USCA covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EMCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMCS | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $912M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.1% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.77% | 12.20% |
| Max drawdown | -44.86% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMCS and USCA
Explore further