Screener
EMDV vs CGIC
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIC costs 0.06% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than EMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMDV follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
- EMDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMDV | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.05% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -39.19% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMDV and CGIC
Explore further