Screener
EMDV vs EFAD
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- EFAD costs 0.10% less per year.
- EFAD is significantly larger than EMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMDV | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $62M |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.05% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -39.19% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMDV and EFAD
Explore further