Screener
EMES vs JHEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- JHEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- JHEM is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- JHEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | JHEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $945M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.9% | +47.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.75% | 18.64% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -34.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and JHEM
Explore further