Screener
EMGF vs GLOF
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than GLOF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMGF follows a index enhanced strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMGF | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $196M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.8% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.44% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -40.23% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMGF and GLOF
Explore further