Screener
EMGF vs ROUS
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
Key differences
- ROUS costs 0.07% less per year.
- EMGF covers emerging markets markets; ROUS covers north america.
- EMGF follows a index enhanced strategy; ROUS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMGF | ROUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $587M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.8% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.44% | 11.43% |
| Max drawdown | -40.23% | -35.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMGF and ROUS
Explore further