Screener
EMGF vs ROAM
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.18% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMGF follows a index enhanced strategy; ROAM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMGF | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $106M |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.8% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.44% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -40.23% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMGF and ROAM
Explore further