Screener
EMHC vs BREM
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- EMHC costs 0.27% less per year.
- EMHC is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMHC | BREM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $252M | $38M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.13% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.03% | -4.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMHC and BREM
Explore further