Screener
EMHC vs BWX
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMHC costs 0.12% less per year.
- BWX is significantly larger than EMHC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMHC covers emerging markets markets; BWX covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EMHC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMHC | BWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $252M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.13% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | -1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | +0.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | -4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | 7.81% |
| Max drawdown | -28.03% | -34.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMHC and BWX
Explore further