Screener
EMHC vs BWZ
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMHC costs 0.12% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EMHC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMHC | BWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $252M | $324M |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 6.13% | 2.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | +2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.42% | 7.03% |
| Max drawdown | -28.03% | -24.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMHC and BWZ
Explore further