Screener
EMHY vs HIMU
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- HIMU costs 0.11% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than EMHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMHY | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $584M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.40% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.63% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -30.11% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMHY and HIMU
Explore further