Screener
EMM vs EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.27% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMM is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $256M |
| Since | 2010 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.6% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.25% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and EMBD
Explore further