Screener
EMBD vs XCNY
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.20% less per year.
- EMBD is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBD is classified as fixed income, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMBD follows a active selection strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $9M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and XCNY
Explore further