Screener
EMM vs VWO
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Key differences
- VWO costs 0.60% less per year.
- VWO is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMM follows a active selection strategy; VWO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $159.9B |
| Since | 2010 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 2.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.6% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.25% | 15.70% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -36.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and VWO
Explore further