Screener
EMMF vs ROUS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
Key differences
- ROUS costs 0.29% less per year.
- ROUS is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMMF covers emerging markets markets; ROUS covers north america.
- EMMF follows a active selection strategy; ROUS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMMF | ROUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $587M |
| Since | 2018 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.07% | 11.43% |
| Max drawdown | -32.57% | -35.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMMF and ROUS
Explore further