Screener
EMMF vs ROAM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- EMMF follows a active selection strategy; ROAM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMMF | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $106M |
| Since | 2018 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.07% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -32.57% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMMF and ROAM
Explore further