Screener
EMNT vs PCRB
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.12% less per year.
- EMNT is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; PCRB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | PCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $7M |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 9.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 3.77% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -7.20% |
Similar to EMNT and PCRB
Explore further