Screener
EMNT vs EUSB
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares ESG Advanced Universal USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- EUSB costs 0.12% less per year.
- EUSB is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; EUSB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | EUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $691M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 3.59% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -17.87% |
Similar to EMNT and EUSB
Explore further