Screener
EMOP vs MATE
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
EMOP is an equity ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. EMOP charges 0.70% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- EMOP is an equity fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- EMOP follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- EMOP costs 0.27% less per year.
- EMOP is much larger than MATE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMOP | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $39M |
| Since | 1995 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.