Skip to content
Screener

EMOP vs MANI

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Man Active Income ETF

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$2.2B

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

0.01%

Fund size

$20M

Key differences

EMOP is an equity ETF, while MANI is an alternative ETF. EMOP charges 0.70% a year and MANI 0.01%.

  • EMOP is an equity fund, while MANI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • MANI costs 0.69% less per year.
  • EMOP is much larger than MANI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMOPMANI
Annual cost (TER)0.70%0.01%
Fund size (AUM)$2.2B$20M
Since19952025
Dividend yield1.50%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-12.87%-0.73%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to EMOP and MANI