Screener
EMPB vs IWN
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 1.97% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than EMPB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMPB is classified as alternative, while IWN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMPB and IWN
Explore further