Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWN vs IWM

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWN

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$13.4B

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$76.9B

Key differences

  • IWM is significantly larger than IWN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

IWNIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.24%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$13.4B$76.9B
Since20002000
Dividend yield1.49%0.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+43.7%+41.8%
CAGR 3Y+18.7%+18.8%
CAGR 5Y+6.9%+6.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.770.75
Volatility 1Y17.87%19.22%
Max drawdown-46.08%-41.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWN and IWM