Screener
EMPB vs OMFL
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
Both EMPB and OMFL are alternative ETFs. EMPB charges 2.21% a year and OMFL 0.29%. The main difference: EMPB follows a active selection strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- OMFL costs 1.92% less per year.
- OMFL is much larger than EMPB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.5% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.31% | 12.38% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -33.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.