Screener
OMFL vs OMFS
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFL costs 0.10% less per year.
- OMFL is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFL is classified as alternative, while OMFS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- OMFL follows a systematic alpha strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFL | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.6B | $275M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.5% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.16% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -33.24% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFL and OMFS
Explore further