Screener
EMSF vs BBLU
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
Both EMSF and BBLU are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and BBLU 0.15%. The main difference: EMSF covers emerging markets; BBLU covers North America.
- EMSF covers emerging markets; BBLU covers North America.
- BBLU costs 0.64% less per year.
- BBLU is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBLU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | BBLU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $436M |
| Since | 2023 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.56% | 11.42% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -17.20% |
Similar to EMSF and BBLU
Explore further