Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMSF vs EVLU

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF

EMSF

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$44M

EVLU

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$13M

Key differences

  • EVLU costs 0.44% less per year.
  • EMSF is significantly larger than EVLU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMSF follows a active selection strategy; EVLU uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

EMSFEVLU
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$44M$13M
Since20232024
Dividend yield5.21%4.54%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+64.8%+59.9%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y24.21%18.33%
Max drawdown-24.75%-17.17%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMSF and EVLU