Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMSF vs QEMM

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

EMSF

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$44M

QEMM

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$47M

Key differences

  • QEMM costs 0.49% less per year.
  • EMSF is classified as equity, while QEMM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • EMSF follows a active selection strategy; QEMM uses index tracking.
  • QEMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMSFQEMM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$44M$47M
Since20232014
Dividend yield5.21%4.27%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+64.8%+36.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+18.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.96
Volatility 1Y24.21%16.31%
Max drawdown-24.75%-36.89%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMSF and QEMM