Screener
EMSF vs NUEM
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EMSF and NUEM are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and NUEM 0.36%. The main difference: EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUEM uses index tracking.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUEM uses index tracking.
- NUEM costs 0.43% less per year.
- NUEM is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | NUEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $393M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 2.98% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.76 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.56% | 19.28% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -39.48% |
Similar to EMSF and NUEM
Explore further