Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMSF vs NUDM

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF

EMSF

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$46M

NUDM

Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.27%

Fund size

$686M

Key differences

Both EMSF and NUDM are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and NUDM 0.27%. The main difference: EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUDM uses index tracking.

  • EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUDM uses index tracking.
  • EMSF covers emerging markets; NUDM covers global markets excluding the US.
  • NUDM costs 0.52% less per year.
  • NUDM is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • NUDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMSFNUDM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.27%
Fund size (AUM)$46M$686M
Since20232017
Dividend yield4.76%5.01%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsglobal ex us
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+57.5%+18.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+16.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.83
Volatility 1Y25.56%15.97%
Max drawdown-24.75%-32.01%

Similar to EMSF and NUDM