Screener
EMTL vs XCNY
State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.46% less per year.
- EMTL is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMTL is classified as fixed income, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMTL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMTL | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $90M | $9M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.22% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -22.91% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMTL and XCNY
Explore further