Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XCNY vs EMHC

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

EMHC

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.23%

Fund size

$252M

Key differences

  • EMHC is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XCNY is classified as equity, while EMHC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.

Side-by-side comparison

XCNYEMHC
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.23%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$252M
Since20242021
Dividend yield2.41%6.13%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+32.6%+11.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+8.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.69
Volatility 1Y16.39%5.42%
Max drawdown-19.70%-28.03%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XCNY and EMHC