Screener
EMXC vs CNYA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.35% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMXC | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $238M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +73.4% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.0% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.58% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMXC and CNYA
Explore further