Screener
ENFR vs AMZA
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs InfraCap MLP ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 1.37% less per year.
- ENFR follows a index tracking strategy; AMZA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ENFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENFR | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $460M | $464M |
| Since | 2013 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 7.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.4% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 17.74% |
| Max drawdown | -62.64% | -86.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENFR and AMZA
Explore further