Screener
ENFR vs MLPD
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.25% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENFR follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- ENFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENFR | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $460M | $29M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -62.64% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENFR and MLPD
Explore further