Screener
PIPE vs MLPX
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- MLPX costs 0.30% less per year.
- MLPX is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIPE covers global markets; MLPX covers north america.
- PIPE follows a active selection strategy; MLPX uses index tracking.
- MLPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -64.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and MLPX
Explore further