Screener
ENHI vs EFV
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
ENHI is an alternative ETF, while EFV is an equity ETF. ENHI charges 0.27% a year and EFV 0.31%.
- ENHI is an alternative fund, while EFV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; EFV uses index tracking.
- EFV is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2026 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.77% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.58% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -43.16% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.