Skip to content
Screener

ENHI vs EFA

iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

ENHI

iShares Enhanced International Active ETF

Annual cost

0.27%

Fund size

$12M

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

ENHI is an alternative ETF, while EFA is an equity ETF. ENHI charges 0.27% a year and EFA 0.32%.

  • ENHI is an alternative fund, while EFA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ENHI follows a active selection strategy; EFA uses index tracking.
  • EFA is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ENHIEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.27%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$12M$77.4B
Since20262001
Dividend yield3.10%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionglobal ex usglobal ex us
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+21.3%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.4%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.87
Volatility 1Y15.64%
Max drawdown-5.65%-34.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ENHI and EFA