Screener
ENHI vs INTF
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- INTF costs 0.11% less per year.
- INTF is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHI is classified as alternative, while INTF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.64% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.65% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -40.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHI and INTF
Explore further