Screener
ENHI vs GLOF
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.07% less per year.
- GLOF is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHI is classified as alternative, while GLOF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $196M |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.57% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.63% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHI and GLOF
Explore further