Screener
ENHU vs IJR
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJR costs 0.16% less per year.
- IJR is significantly larger than ENHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHU follows a active selection strategy; IJR uses index tracking.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHU | IJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $102.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.65% |
| Max drawdown | -8.98% | -44.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHU and IJR
Explore further